Quantum Fingerprinting
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Simulation or modelingConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.920
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.484
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Classical fingerprinting associates with each string a shorter string (its fingerprint), such that any two distinct strings can be distinguished with small error by comparing their fingerprints alone. The fingerprints cannot be made exponentially smaller than the original strings unless the parties preparing the fingerprints have access to correlated random sources. We show that fingerprints consisting of quantum information can be made exponentially smaller than the original strings without any correlations or entanglement between the parties. This implies an exponential quantum/classical gap for the equality problem in the simultaneous message passing model of communication complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Topic
- Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Field
- Computer Science
- Canadian institutions
- University of Calgary
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- Quantum entanglementString (physics)Fingerprint (computing)QuantumComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Exponential growthQuantum cryptographyUncorrelatedExponential functionAlgorithmStatistical physicsTheoretical computer scienceQuantum informationMathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes