MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037717643 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.200946

Canada’s National Emergency Stockpile System: time for a new long-term strategy

2020· article· en· W3037717643 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Scott Laing, Ellen Westervelt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsQueensway-Carleton HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStockpileGovernment (linguistics)BusinessMedical emergencyKey (lock)Stock (firearms)Term (time)MedicineOperations managementComputer securityComputer scienceEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS Recent media reports identified that millions of personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies in Canada’s National Emergency Stockpile System (NESS) have expired and gone to waste.[1][1] Government officials and health care organizations are also trying urgently to secure new stock to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.008
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0060.008
Research integrity0.0170.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207