A Wide-Deep-Sequence Model-Based Quality Prediction Method in Industrial Process Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Product quality prediction, as an important issue of industrial intelligence, is a typical task of industrial process analysis, in which product quality will be evaluated and improved as feedback for industrial process adjustment. Data-driven methods, with predictive model to analyze various industrial data, have been received considerable attention in recent years. However, to get an accurate prediction, it is an essential issue to extract quality features from industrial data, including several variables generated from supply chain and time-variant machining process. In this article, a data-driven method based on wide-deep-sequence (WDS) model is proposed to provide a reliable quality prediction for industrial process with different types of industrial data. To process industrial data of high redundancy, in this article, data reduction is first conducted on different variables by different techniques. Also, an improved wide-deep (WD) model is proposed to extract quality features from key time-invariant variables. Meanwhile, an long short-term memory (LSTM)-based sequence model is presented for exploring quality information from time-domain features. Under the joint training strategy, these models will be combined and optimized by a designed penalty mechanism for unreliable predictions, especially on reduction of defective products. Finally, experiments on a real-world manufacturing process data set are carried out to present the effectiveness of the proposed method in product quality prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it