Evaluation of the Properties of an Electrolyte Based on Formamide and LiTFSI for Electrochemical Capacitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of electrical energy storage devices depend on the electrolyte properties. Concentrated electrolytes are promising for high-performance energy storage devices thanks to their inherent safety and low cost. We study here different concentrated solutions composed of LiTFSI as a salt (0.5, 1.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 4.5 M) and formamide as a solvent for electrochemical capacitor applications. These electrolytes exhibit appreciable ionic conductivity (2.3 to 8.2 mS cm −1 ), are favor of electrochemical properties of activated carbon-based EDLC. Electrochemical results reveal that, compared to usual electrolytes, high concentrated electrolytes exhibit long-term cyclability with significant capacitance up to 2000 cycles at an operating voltage of 2.2 V. Moreover, this study shows that low concentrated electrolytes highly corrode the Al current collector whereas the high concentrated electrolytes suppress the Al current collector corrosion process owing to the lack of free solvent (uncoordinated to a Li + cation).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".