MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037837450 · doi:10.7202/1069932ar

Gaétan Gervais ou l’engagement d’un intellectuel historien

2020· article· fr· W3037837450 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Michel Bock

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers Charlevoix Études franco-ontariennes · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Notre estimé confrère Gaétan Gervais (1944-2018), cofondateur de la Société Charlevoix et titulaire du premier fauteuil, nous a quittés à l’âge de 74 ans le 20 octobre 2018. Il a rejoint nos regrettés collègues Roger Bernard (1944-2000), Fernand Dorais (1928-2003) et René Dionne (1929-2018), qui formaient, avec Fernand Ouellet , aujourd’hui membre émérite, et le signataire de ce mot, l’équipe du volume inaugural de ce collectif en 1995, soit les titulaires des six premiers fauteuils de notre association. Michel Bock a accepté de retoucher la conférence d’ouverture inédite donnée à Sudbury, le 25 mars 2010, au colloque « L’Université Laurentienne : berceau de la culture et de l’identité franco-ontariennes ». Dans sa mise en contexte – « Gaétan Gervais, l’Université Laurentienne et l’Ontario français : l’engagement d’un intellectuel historien » –, livrée sans flagornerie en présence de l’intéressé, Bock montre la place prépondérante qu’a occupée son maître dans le développement du champ historiographique franco-ontarien et, en relisant ses travaux, il cerne le parcours et les convictions de ce chercheur pionnier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.922

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers Charlevoix Études franco-ontariennesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207