An energy-based model for the wear of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced epoxy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wear resistance of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced epoxy under severe abrasive sliding conditions was studied. It was found that unidirectional laminates tested with the fibers parallel to the sliding direction (UDp) were more wear resistant than the same laminates tested with fibers transverse to the sliding direction (UDap) under the same set of test conditions. A novel energy-based model was developed to explain the difference in the wear rates. It was found that the difference in wear rates between the two orientations was due to differences in the average volume to surface area ratio of the debris, the energy required to generate new surfaces, and a new k factor that represents the fraction of the total friction energy used for creating wear particles. Furthermore, wear volume per sliding distance was found to be linearly proportional the total frictional energy dissipation for both orientations. These findings can be used to simplify wear predictions for industrial applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it