MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037932381 · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.02.007

CACNB2 rs11013860 polymorphism correlates of prefrontal cortex thickness in bipolar patients with first-episode mania

2020· article· en· W3037932381 on OpenAlexaff
Jiangshan Chen, Jiuwei Tan, Andrew J. Greenshaw, Jeffrey Sawalha, Yang S. Liu, Xiaofei Zhang, Wenjin Zou, Xiaofang Cheng, Wenhao Deng, Yizhi Zhang, Liqian Cui, Chuihong Liu, Jiaqi Sun, Xiongchao Cheng, Qiuxia Wu, Suyi Li, Siming Mai, Xiaofeng Lan, Yingmei Chen, Yinglian Cai, Chaodun Zheng, Daomeng Cheng, Bin Zhang, Chanjuan Yang, Xuan Li, Xin‐Min Li, Biyu Ye, Muhammad Yousefnezhad, Yamin Zhang, Liansheng Zhao, Jair C. Soares, Xiangyang Zhang, Tao Li, Bo Cao, Liping Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational ResearchNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaScience and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong ProvinceNational Key Laboratory Foundation of ChinaBrain and Behavior Research Foundation
KeywordsBipolar disorderOrbitofrontal cortexPrefrontal cortexManiaFrontal lobeAllelePsychologyInternal medicineNeuroscienceMedicineBiologyGeneticsGeneCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Affective DisordersSame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207