Towards User-Friendly Wearable Platforms for Monitoring Unconstrained Indoor and Outdoor Activities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developing wearable platforms for unconstrained monitoring of limb movements has been an active recent topic of research due to potential applications such as clinical and athletic performance evaluation. However, practicality of these platforms might be affected by the dynamic and complexity of movements as well as characteristics of the surrounding environment. This paper addresses such issues by proposing a novel method for obtaining kinematic information of joints using a custom-designed wearable platform. The proposed method uses data from two gyroscopes and an array of textile stretch sensors to accurately track three-dimensional movements, including extension, flexion, and rotation, of a joint. More specifically, gyroscopes provide angular velocity data of two sides of a joint, while their relative orientation is estimated by a machine learning algorithm. An Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) algorithm is applied to directly fuse angular velocity/relative orientation data and estimate the kinematic orientation of the joint. Experimental evaluations were carried out using data from 10 volunteers performing a series of predefined as well as unconstrained random three-dimensional trunk movements. Results show that the proposed sensor setup and the UKF-based data fusion algorithm can accurately estimate the orientation of the trunk relative to pelvis with an average error of less than 1.72 degrees in predefined movements and a comparable accuracy of 3.00 degrees in random movements. Moreover, the proposed platform is easy to setup, does not restrict body motion, and is not affected by environmental disturbances. This study is a further step towards developing user-friendly wearable sensor systems than can be readily used in indoor and outdoor settings without requiring bulky equipment or a tedious calibration phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".