MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A High Efficiency High Power-Density LLC DC-DC Converter for Electric Vehicles (EVs) On-Board Low Voltage DC-DC Converter (LDC) Application

2020· article· en· W3037988493 on OpenAlexaff
Xiang Zhou, Bo Sheng, Wenbo Liu, Yang Chen, Andrew Yurek, Yan‐Fei Liu, P.C. Sen, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsMagna International (Canada)Queen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical engineeringConvertersForward converterCharge pumpBoost converterCapacitorRectifier (neural networks)Flyback converterTransformerĆuk converterVoltagePower densityMaterials sciencePower (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a high efficiency high power-density LLC DC-DC converter for Electric Vehicles (EVs) on-board low voltage DC-DC converter (LDC) application. In the proposed LDC, primary switches achieve ZVS turn-on and secondary synchronous rectifier switches achieve ZVS turn-on and ZCS turn-off. To reduce current stress and improve efficiency, three phase interleaved LLC DC-DC converters are paralleled to provide more than 200A load current. Switch-Controlled Capacitor (SCC) technology is used to achieve the load current sharing of the three phase LLC DC-DC converter. In addition, GaN HEMTs are used in the transformer primary to improve the switching frequency and power-density. To verify the analysis, a 3.8kW(14V/270A) LLC DC-DC converter prototype is designed. The experimental results show that full load efficiency is 95.8% at 270A load current and 3kW/L power-density is achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207