MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Interleaved SCC-LCLC Converter with TO-220 GaN HEMTs and Accurate Current Sharing for Wide Operating Range in Data Center Application

2020· article· en· W3038015922 on OpenAlexaff
Mojtaba Forouzesh, Bo Sheng, Yan‐Fei Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorInterleavingMaterials scienceVoltageBoost converterComputer scienceElectrical engineeringElectrical impedanceElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an interleaved LCLC converter with TO-220 enhancement mode GaN devices (e-mode GaN) and accurate current sharing performance is introduced for data center application. Any tolerance in the resonant tank elements can lead to large load imbalance between different phases. Due to the steep gain curve of LCLC converter, conventional current sharing methods are not so effective. In the proposed converter the impedances of the resonant networks are matched by switching a capacitor (i.e. Switch Controlled Capacitor SCC) in series with the resonant capacitor in one or some of the phases, which results in accurate load current sharing between phases (i.e. around 0.025% difference). The load share of each phase is sensed through the resonant current on each phase and the control logic is applied so current sharing between all phases can be achieved. By this method, an accurate current sharing is achieved for a wide input voltage range that is required for hold up time in data center application. Moreover, interleaving is applied in the proposed multi-phase LCLC converter resulting in low stress on the output capacitor allowing sole ceramic capacitor implementation. Moreover, phase shedding allows a flat high conversion efficiency curve for a wide load range. The performance of the proposed interleaved LCLC converter is verified by a two-phase 1 kW prototype with 250 V - 400 V input voltage and fixed 12 V output voltage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207