MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038025191 · doi:10.7812/tpp/19.139

Narrating the Cycle of Life

2020· article· en· W3038025191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Permanente Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeCurriculumNarrative medicineMedical humanitiesNarrative reviewMedical history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Narrative medicine (NM) is an approach that values the patient's narrative about his/her disease as central to the clinical encounter and helps doctors to be more attentive to their patients' perspectives in the diagnostic and therapeutic process. A curricular change enabled a greater insertion of the humanities in the curriculum of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Brasília in Brasília, Brazil. In this context, NM was incorporated into one of the disciplines of the third semester. During the semester, students are encouraged to write, in small groups, a narrative combining fictional and real aspects of the history of life (and disease) of one patient. In the present article, the authors describe the educational experience of the insertion of NM in the medical curriculum and share personal impressions about the multiple possibilities of this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it