MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038153773 · doi:10.1002/pssb.202000191

Local Structure Analysis around Ti in Lead Zirconate Titanate by X‐Ray Fluorescence Holography

2020· article· en· W3038153773 on OpenAlexafffund
Kouichi Hayashi, Cong Lu, Artoni Kevin R. Ang, Kenji Ohwada, Yujuan Xie, Wen Hu, T. Matsushita, Naohisa Happo, Shinya Hosokawa, Alexei A. Bokov, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (b) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCrystallography and Radiation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersOffice of Naval Research GlobalJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLead zirconate titanateMaterials scienceFerroelectricityDielectricPiezoelectricityHolographyCrystal structureDiffractionCrystal (programming language)OpticsMineralogyCrystallographyOptoelectronicsChemistryPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To clarify the mechanism of ferroelectricity in lead zirconate titanate (PZT), the local structure around Ti in a Pb(Zr0.7Ti0.3)O3 single crystal is investigated using X‐ray fluorescence holography. The raw hologram data are contaminated by periodic noise due to the fluctuation of the incident X‐ray intensity. The periodical noise is successfully removed using an inverse Fourier transformation method. From the filtered holograms, the atomic images around Ti can be reconstructed clearly. The reconstructions of B‐site cations demonstrate an outward displacement of the neighboring Ti from the ideal B‐site position, indicating an expansion of the local lattice around Ti. In addition, the splitting of Pb images is found, and the relative displacement between Ti and Pb atoms is deduced. These results contribute to the understanding of the local structure of PZT and can reveal the microscopic origins of very high dielectric and piezoelectric responses, which are essential for designing new and improved ferroelectric materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (b)Same topicCrystallography and Radiation PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207