MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038175048 · doi:10.34010/rnlj.v1i1.2495

ANALISIS HUKUM STATUS KEWARGANEGARAAN GANDA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2006 TENTANG KEWARGANEGARAAN

2019· article· id· W3038175048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRes Nullius Law Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMathematicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warga negara merupakan salah satu unsur dari negara yang harus dipenuhi untuk bisa disebut sebagai sebuah Negara, Indonesia secara tegas tidak menerapkan status kewarganegaraan ganda di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 tahun 2006 tentang Kewarganegaraan, kecuali pada anak dalam kondisi tertentu atau yang disebut dengan prinsip Kewarganegaraan ganda terbatas. Yang dimaksud dengan terbatas disini adalah bahwa terhadap anak-anak hasil kawin campur diberikan batas waktu terakhir sampai berusia 21 tahun untuk memilih salah satu kewarganegaraan yang dimiliki yaitu memilih antara berkewarganegaraan Indonesia atau berkewarganegaraan asing. (2) Wacana penerapan kewarganegaraan ganda memerlukan kajian, pandangan, dan masukan dari pakar. Kalaupun harus ada revisi terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 12 tahun 2006 tentang Kewarganegaraan, Indonesia harus tetap menganut sistem kewarganegaraan tunggal, bukan kewarganegaraan ganda, karna kewarganegaraan ganda tidak memberikan kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat, disamping itu kewarganegaraan ganda juga lebih banyak berdampak negatif bagi bangsa dan Negara Indonesia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it