ANALISIS HUKUM STATUS KEWARGANEGARAAN GANDA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2006 TENTANG KEWARGANEGARAAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Warga negara merupakan salah satu unsur dari negara yang harus dipenuhi untuk bisa disebut sebagai sebuah Negara, Indonesia secara tegas tidak menerapkan status kewarganegaraan ganda di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 12 tahun 2006 tentang Kewarganegaraan, kecuali pada anak dalam kondisi tertentu atau yang disebut dengan prinsip Kewarganegaraan ganda terbatas. Yang dimaksud dengan terbatas disini adalah bahwa terhadap anak-anak hasil kawin campur diberikan batas waktu terakhir sampai berusia 21 tahun untuk memilih salah satu kewarganegaraan yang dimiliki yaitu memilih antara berkewarganegaraan Indonesia atau berkewarganegaraan asing. (2) Wacana penerapan kewarganegaraan ganda memerlukan kajian, pandangan, dan masukan dari pakar. Kalaupun harus ada revisi terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 12 tahun 2006 tentang Kewarganegaraan, Indonesia harus tetap menganut sistem kewarganegaraan tunggal, bukan kewarganegaraan ganda, karna kewarganegaraan ganda tidak memberikan kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat, disamping itu kewarganegaraan ganda juga lebih banyak berdampak negatif bagi bangsa dan Negara Indonesia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".