Dynamic Resource Management for Cloud Spot Markets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resource management for cloud computing environments that are characterized by many layers emerges as a critical task for cloud computing providers. Such providers are compelled by the demands and strategies of stochastic customers to adopt dynamic resource management for the top-bottom scaling of the cloud resources on the basis of variable needs. Resource management in the infrastructure as a service layer relies on virtual machine (VM) characteristics, such as estimated VM classes. Given that a cloud provider offers a variety of VM classes that differ as regards the size of computing resources (e.g., central processing unit, memory, and input/output devices), optimizing cloud resources to maximize cloud revenue is a challenging dilemma. More specifically, the dynamic management of resources in cloud spot markets is confronted with various severe obstacles. In consideration of these issues, this study investigated a dynamic resource management model for cloud spot markets and put forward an efficient model that manages spare resources for the purpose of expanding cloud revenue. The model estimates the available spare capacity of a spot market, evaluates the maximum expected revenue of stagnant VMs on the basis estimated cumulative capacity, and locates the optimum VM combinations that bear complementary workloads and capacities and can coexist in a certain host. Our model also improves the understanding of cloud resource scaling and generates inferences that can be adopted in managing cloud resources for all layers as well as Reserved and On-Demand markets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".