MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038197137 · doi:10.3917/lcdm.033.0177

Achever Clausewitz et The Internationalists

2020· article· fr· W3038197137 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Dumouchel

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Champs de Mars · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicViolence, Religion, and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstitutionPolitical sciencePhilosophyHumanitiesEthnologySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Girard et Chantre, dans Achever Clausewitz , analysent le processus d’évolution des conflits depuis les guerres napoléoniennes qui, en raison de la dynamique des affrontements violents entre les nations, a conduit à la disparition de la guerre comme institution limitant et encadrant la violence des conflits. Hathaway et Shapiro, dans The Internationalists , montrent comment, depuis le pacte Briand-Kellogg qui rend la guerre illégale, celle-ci a cessé d’être une institution et un moyen légal de gestion des conflits. Ce texte se propose de comparer et mettre en rapport ces deux façons d’entendre « la disparition de la guerre comme institution ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Champs de MarsSame topicViolence, Religion, and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207