Inversion Recovery Susceptibility Weighted Imaging With Enhanced T2 Weighting at 3 T Improves Visualization of Subpial Cortical Multiple Sclerosis Lesions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Cortical demyelination is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and can be extensive. Cortical lesions contribute to disability independently from white matter lesions and may form via a distinct mechanism. However, current magnetic resonance imaging methods at 3 T are insensitive to cortical, and especially subpial cortical, lesions. Subpial lesions are well seen on T2*-weighted imaging at 7 T, but T2*-weighted methods on 3 T scanners are limited by poor lesion-to-cortex and cerebrospinal fluid-to-lesion contrast. We aimed to develop and evaluate a cerebrospinal fluid-suppressed, T2*-weighted sequence optimized for subpial cortical lesion visualization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a new magnetic resonance imaging sequence, inversion recovery susceptibility weighted imaging with enhanced T2 weighting (IR-SWIET; 0.8 mm × 0.8 mm in plane, 0.64 mm slice thickness with whole brain coverage, acquisition time ~5 minutes). We compared cortical lesion visualization independently on IR-SWIET (median signal from 4 acquisitions), magnetization-prepared 2 rapid acquisition gradient echoes (MP2RAGE), double inversion recovery (DIR), T2*-weighted segmented echo-planar imaging, and phase-sensitive inversion recovery images for 10 adults with MS. We also identified cortical lesions with a multicontrast reading of IR-SWIET (median of 2 acquisitions), MP2RAGE, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images for each case. Lesions identified on 3 T images were verified on "gold standard" 7 T T2* and MP2RAGE images. RESULTS: Cortical, and particularly subpial, lesions appeared much more conspicuous on IR-SWIET compared with other 3 T methods. A total of 101 true-positive subpial lesions were identified on IR-SWIET (average per-participant sensitivity vs 7 T, 29% ± 8%) versus 36 on MP2RAGE (5% ± 2%; comparison to IR-SWIET sensitivity, P = 0.07), 17 on FLAIR (2% ± 1%; P < 0.05), 28 on DIR (6% ± 2%; P < 0.05), 42 on T2*-weighted segmented echo-planar imaging (11% ± 5%; P < 0.05), and 13 on phase-sensitive inversion recovery (4% ± 2%; P < 0.05). When a combination of IR-SWIET, MP2RAGE, and FLAIR images was used, a total of 147 subpial lesions (30% ± 5%) were identified versus 83 (16% ± 3%, P < 0.01) on a combination of DIR, MP2RAGE, and FLAIR. More cases had at least 1 subpial lesion on IR-SWIET, and IR-SWIET improved cortical lesion subtyping accuracy and correlation with 7 T subpial lesion number. CONCLUSIONS: Subpial lesions are better visualized on IR-SWIET compared with other 3 T methods. A 3 T protocol combining IR-SWIET with MP2RAGE, in which leukocortical lesions are well seen, improves cortical lesion visualization over existing approaches. Therefore, IR-SWIET may enable improved MS diagnostic specificity and a better understanding of the clinical implications of cortical demyelination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".