MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3038205373

Educational Philosophy is the Foundation of Teaching Practices for Professional Learning

2020· article· en· W3038205373 on OpenAlexaff
Gazi Farok, Melissa Nantais

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoundation (evidence)Professional learning communityPedagogyBridge (graph theory)Mathematics educationPhilosophy of educationTeaching philosophyTeaching and learning centerNarrativeProfessional developmentTeaching methodEngineering ethicsSociologyPsychologyHigher educationEngineeringPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Educational philosophy is a concept of believe that all students are capable of learning. It is carried out as an outlook on approach to instruction of education. Teacher leads this system for students or group of learners. It is a learning tool to view and analyze goals for students’ perspectives. It defines a bridge of professional teaching skills and needs of society. It is an ethical and narrative path of descriptions for justification of teaching and learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.037
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation and Critical Thinking Development→French-language works237,207→