A Comparison of the Elemental Concentrations Obtained using X-ray Microanalysis of Bulk Cryofractured and Ultrathin Cryosectioned Mucus Layer of the Airway Surface Liquid in Mouse Trachea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The airways are lined with a thin film consisting of two layers. A watery layer, the airway surface liquid (ASL) surrounds the cilia and its major function is to serve as a medium for ciliary boating of mucus out of the respiratory system. The other layer is a viscous mucus layer consisting mainly of airway cellular secretions and cellular debris. The composition and effects of altered concentrations of the constitutive elements in the ASL and mucus layer remain a mystery. in human patients, attempts have been made to determine the composition of these layers by sampling with a filter paper by touching it to the mucosa and wetting it by capillary action. This material was then removed from the filter paper and quantitative analyses using energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS) and a Hall’s thin film correction routine performed on the residue. Although differences were detected between normal and pathological material, these results did not reflect the composition of the individual layers but an average of both. Attempts have been made to determine the elemental composition of these layers in intact and in cultured rabbit trachea, bovine trachea and hamster trachea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".