MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038305864 · doi:10.7202/1069912ar

Médiation, art et inclusion sociale des femmes

2020· article· fr· W3038305864 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Marcelle Dubé, Kheira Belhadj-Ziane

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche visant à décrire et à comprendre l’expérience vécue par des femmes dans le cadre de leur participation aux « Moments Créatifs » du Musée d’art contemporain de Montréal (MACM). De manière plus spécifique, il s’agit de questionner les liens qu’il est possible de faire entre l’art et le social en examinant comment et à quelles conditions le dispositif de médiation culturelle déployé dans ces ateliers contient le potentiel de favoriser l’inclusion sociale de ces femmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.016
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.384
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.095 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207