MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038308014 · doi:10.7202/1067550ar

Les groupes de parole en milieu scolaire : un espace de développement du bien-être psychologique des jeunes réfugiés

2019· article· fr· W3038308014 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Garine Papazian-Zohrabian, Caterina Mamprin, Vanessa Lemire

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de psychologie · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Durant ces dernières années, avec l’arrivée de nombreux réfugiés au Québec, les écoles se sont mobilisées pour faciliter l’accueil de ces élèves. Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche-action menée auprès de jeunes élèves réfugiés syriens et tend à démontrer la pertinence de la mise en place d’une activité encadrée d’expression libre (groupes de parole en classe), visant le développement du bien-être psychologique des élèves. L’analyse thématique des données découlant de cette activité menée dans cinq classes d’accueil nous permet de souligner que cette activité a permis l’élaboration des deuils et des traumas, et a contribué au développement du bien-être psychologique des élèves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de psychologieSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207