MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038357890 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.014301

Examining the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> shell closure through high-precision mass measurements of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Ar</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>46</mml:mn><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mn>48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2020· article· lv· W3038357890 on OpenAlexaff
M. Mougeot, D. Atanasov, C. Barbieri, K. Blaum, M. Breitenfeld, A. de Roubin, T. Duguet, S. George, F. Herfurth, A. Herlert, J. D. Holt, J. Karthein, D. Lunney, V. Manea, P. Navrátil, D. Neidherr, M. Rosenbusch, L. Schweikhard, A. Schwenk, V. Somà, A. Welker, F. Wienholtz, R. Wolf, Κ. Zuber

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesHorizon 2020Grand Équipement National De Calcul IntensifDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMax-Planck-GesellschaftBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean CommissionUniversity of Leicester
KeywordsPhysicsValence (chemistry)Atomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The strength of the $N=28$ magic number in neutron-rich argon isotopes is examined through high-precision mass measurements of $^{46\text{--}48}\mathrm{Ar}$, performed with the ISOLTRAP mass spectrometer at ISOLDE/CERN. The new mass values are up to 90 times more precise than previous measurements. While they suggest the persistence of the $N=28$ shell closure for argon, we show that this conclusion has to be nuanced in light of the wealth of spectroscopic data and theoretical investigations performed with the SDPF-U phenomenological shell model interaction. Our results are also compared with ab initio calculations using the valence space in-medium similarity renormalization group and the self-consistent Green's function approaches. Both calculations provide a very good account of mass systematics at and around $Z=18$ and, generally, a consistent description of the physics in this region. This combined analysis indicates that $^{46}\mathrm{Ar}$ is the transition between the closed-shell $^{48}\mathrm{Ca}$ and collective $^{44}\mathrm{S}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0080.009
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1170.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207