MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038404597

Is Romania in a social and economic crisis caused by emigration? The new policy of the Romanian state on migration

2020· article· en· W3038404597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cristina Ilie Goga

Bibliographic record

VenueSociology and Social Work Review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationRomanianWorkforceContext (archaeology)PhenomenonPopulationState (computer science)European unionQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceGovernment (linguistics)Social policyDevelopment economicsEconomic growthEconomic policyDemographic economicsEconomicsGeographySociologyDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Romania is a major labor force exporter, especially for other European Union states. Starting with 1990, more than three and a half million people left Romania, almost a quarter of the population of this state. The Romanian Government has witnessed this phenomenon for many years, often seeing it as a positive phenomenon, although experts in the field have warned on the devastating effects of the phenomenon on longterm. The presentation focuses on answering a question: Is Romania in a social and economic crisis caused by emigration? Analyzing the socio-economic situation, the answer is undoubtedly ”Yes”. The effects are devastating: demographic decline, decrease of workforce, emigration of doctors and highly qualified specialists, children left home without protection and many others. In this context, in the last three years, the Romanian state has begun to apply an aggressive policy to attract back the Romanian emigrants and to fill the labor market deficit with workers from other countries..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociology and Social Work ReviewSame topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207