MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038446920 · doi:10.1113/ep088783

Effect of aerobic fitness on the relation between age and whole‐body heat exchange during exercise‐heat stress: a retrospective analysis

2020· article· en· W3038446920 on OpenAlexafffund
Sean R. Notley, Robert D. Meade, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHeat stressAerobic exerciseStress (linguistics)Aerobic capacityRelation (database)Physical therapyPsychologyMedicineBiologyAnimal scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Does higher aerobic fitness, indexed by peak oxygen uptake ( ), attenuate the age‐related decline in thermoregulatory function during exercise in the heat? What is the main finding and its importance? When assessed in aerobically fit and less fit adults ( : ∼30 vs. ∼50 ml kg−1 min−1) aged 18–66 years, a steeper decline in whole‐body total heat loss (evaporative + dry heat exchange) was observed with increasing age in less aerobically fit adults. These outcomes indicate that increased aerobic fitness may attenuate the age‐related decline in thermoregulatory function during exercise‐heat stress. Abstract Ageing is associated with decrements in cutaneous vasodilatation and sweating that attenuate whole‐body total heat loss (evaporative + dry heat exchange) during exercise‐heat stress. However, it remains uncertain whether increased aerobic fitness, as indexed by peak oxygen uptake ( ), slows that age‐related decline. To evaluate this possibility, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data from aerobically fit (n = 38; : (mean (SD)) 49 (4) ml kg−1 min−1) and less fit (n = 35; : 32 (3) ml kg−1 min−1) adults spanning a broad age range (18–65 vs. 18–66 years). Participants performed three, 30 min bouts of cycling at metabolic heat productions of 150, 200 and 250 W m−2, each separated by 15 min recovery, in dry heat (40˚C, ∼15% relative humidity). Metabolic heat production and whole‐body total heat loss were measured using indirect and direct calorimetry, respectively. Total heat loss (mean (95% CI)) declined at a rate of 5 (2, 8), 6 (3, 8) and 5 (3, 10) W m−2 per decade during exercise at metabolic heat productions of 150, 200 and 250 W m−2, respectively, in less aerobically fit individuals (all P ≤ 0.002), due primarily to reductions in evaporative heat loss. In contrast, no significant associations between age and total heat loss were observed in aerobically fit individuals (all P ≥ 0.146). As such, the slope of the age‐related reduction in total heat loss was steeper in less fit compared to fit individuals across all three exercise bouts (all P ≤ 0.029). These outcomes indicate that increased aerobic fitness attenuates the age‐related decline in exercise thermoregulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207