MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038465126 · doi:10.31595/biyan.v2i1.243

MANAJEMEN PUSAT KESEJAHTERAAN SOSIAL DESA SEKARWANGI KECAMATAN SOREANG KABUPATEN BANDUNG

2020· article· id· W3038465126 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Annisa Purnamawati Putri, Didiet Widiowati, Dede Kuswanda

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan dan Pelayanan Pekerjaan Sosial (Biyan) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of BristolInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pusat Kesejahteraan Sosial (Puskesos) merupakan organisasi berbasis masyarakat yang memiliki peran dalam penanganan kemiskinan di tingkat desa/kelurahan. Nilai strategis Puskesos yaitu adanya Basis Data Terpadu (BDT) yang memuat data warga miskin dan rentan miskin di desa/kelurahan. Puskesos juga merupakan organisasi yang menggunakan pendekatan single window services untuk penyaluran bantuan sosial. Optimalisasi fungsi Puskesos salah satunya dapat dilihat dari perspektif manajemen. Penelitian ini menjabarkan manajemen Puskesos Exen-Bersama serta penerapan Model ARC untuk peningkatan efektivitas manajemen Puskesos. Manajemen Puskesos dilihat dari tingkah laku manajerial dan komponen organisasi yang terdiri dari institutional subsystem, management subsystem, dan production subsystem. Penelitian aksi dan tindakan digunakan sebagai metode penelitian serta melibatkan penerapan teknik penelitian partisipatif. Intervensi yang telah dilakukan berdampak pada perubahan pada tiga komponen organisasi berupa pengukuhan Peraturan Desa tentang Puskesos, manajemen data warga Desa Sekarwangi, dan data warga yang dapat diakses cepat. Penelitian ini memberi gambaran bahwa Puskesos sebagai organisasi pelayanan manusia dapat berperan lebih efektif dengan melakukan pembenahan aspek-aspek manajemen. Kata Kunci: Puskesos; Manajemen; single window services; Model ARC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan dan Pelayanan Pekerjaan Sosial (Biyan)Same topicHealthcare Quality and SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207