MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low Group Delay Interpolation Filter For Delta-Sigma Converters

2020· article· en· W3038506308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsFilter designControl theory (sociology)MathematicsRoot-raised-cosine filterDigital filterLow-pass filterFilter (signal processing)Group delay and phase delayLinear filterm-derived filterFinite impulse responseButterworth filterRaised-cosine filterComputer scienceLinear phasePrototype filterElectronic engineeringAlgorithmEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper shows how a relaxation of the high frequency requirements can help reducing the latency in linear phase interpolation filter, with an audio production system perspective. The reduced need for attenuation is justified when the interpolation filter is followed by a noise-shaping Delta-Sigma loop and an analog filtering stage. This is done by using a non-constant error weight of the stop-band. In order to use the Parks-McClellan method for finite impulse response filter design from Matlab, the stop-band is divided and weighted logarithmically. Quantitative results are shown for different example filter design, limited to situations where the Parks-McClellan converges well. It has been found that the shorter the filter length needed to respect a given filter template, the more relative group delay reduction can be achieved by relaxing the high frequency requirement. For filter size of the order of 100, reduction of group delay of 30% can be expected. For sake of simplicity, the Delta-Sigma loop is discussed but not analysed here. The idea is demonstrated in the context of Digital-to-Analog converters (DAC) but by duality could be applicable also to Analog-to-Digital converters (ADC). The main performance metric used is a relative reduction of the impulse response group delay. The results are also presented as impulse responses and power spectrum examples. The presented approach may be generalised to complex and non-linear phase filters and does not prevent the use of polyphase structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207