MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038592557 · doi:10.4000/cve.7573

Repenser le patrimoine, hier et aujourd’hui. Le génie de John Ruskin

2020· article· fr· W3038592557 on OpenAlexaff
Jérôme Bastianelli

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers victoriens et édouardiens · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryNational heritageEnvironmental ethicsArtLiteratureAestheticsArt historyPhilosophyEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans sa conférence grand public, Jérôme Bastianelli retrace l’histoire du Crystal Palace, et s’appuie sur le pamphlet écrit par John Ruskin en 1854 au moment de l’inauguration du bâtiment (qui abrita les expositions universelles jusqu’en 1936) pour réfléchir au caractère novateur de sa conception de la sauvegarde du patrimoine — une conception dont on retrouve les traces dans les initiatives contemporaines prises par les pouvoirs publics et les institutions culturelles actuelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers victoriens et édouardiensSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207