MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038605622

Laboratory Measurements of Frequency-Dependent Seismic Properties of Cracked and Fluid-Saturated Media

2012· article· en· W3038605622 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Schijns, Ian Jackson, Douglas R. Schmitt

Bibliographic record

VenueEGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOscillation (cell signaling)Materials scienceFlexural strengthShear (geology)Pore water pressureShear modulusSaturation (graph theory)GeologyComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringMechanicsChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The capability to perform laboratory measurements with both low-frequency forced-oscillation and high-frequency wave-propagation methods, under conditions of independently controlled confining and pore-fluid pressure, offers the prospect of new insight into the frequency-dependent seismic properties expected of cracked and fluid-saturated rocks of the Earths upper crust. An important step in the development of such broad-band capability has been the modification of existing laboratory equipment to newly allow flexural, as well as torsional, forced-oscillation testing of cylindrical rock specimens. Flexural oscillation tests on an experimental assembly containing a fused silica control specimen yield results indistinguishable from those of numerical modelling with both finite-difference and finite-element methods ? demonstrating the viability of the method. Both torsional and flexural oscillation methods along with complementary high-frequency wave propagation methods have been applied to specimens of dense polycrystalline alumina and quartzite, each thermally cracked to generate an interconnected network of cracks of low aspect ratio, and tested dry, and saturated with either argon or water. The shear and flexural moduli vary systematically with effective pressure ? providing clear evidence of pressure-induced crack closure. Similarities and differences between effective moduli measured under different conditions of pore-fluid saturation are tentatively interpreted in terms of the timescales for stress-induced redistribution of pore fluid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGU General Assembly Conference AbstractsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207