Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bør dødshjelp legaliseres? Spørsmålet diskuteres aktivt over hele den vestlige verden, og flere land og stater har endret regelverket de siste årene. Denne antologien gir en grundig innføring i spørsmålet i et nordisk perspektiv. Forfatterne har bakgrunn fra Norge, Sverige, Danmark og Finland, og de presenterer lovverk, praksis og debatt fra hvert enkelt land. Boken gir en bred oversikt over saksfeltet og formidler dessuten forskning og erfaringer fra blant annet Nederland, USA og Canada. Boken har en tydelig grunntone – i form av en kritisk innstilling til legalisering. Hovedvekten ligger på argumenter som taler mot legalisering, samtidig som argumenter for legalisering også vurderes kritisk. Et mål med boken er likevel å bringe det offentlige ordskiftet om dødshjelp videre. Forfatterne legger fram forslag til felles terminologi og identifiserer ulike spor i debatten. Dødshjelp i Norden? Etikk, klinikk og politikk er en viktig bok for alle som vil sette seg grundig inn i dødshjelpsspørsmålet og debatten om legalisering. Boken er skrevet for en bred allmennhet, men vil være særlig nyttig for helsearbeidere, studenter innenfor medisin, helsefag og etikk samt politiske beslutningstakere og journalister. Forfatterne har bakgrunn fra medisin, filosofi, medisinsk etikk, teologi og språkvitenskap, og de belyser spørsmålet fra ulike faglige og personlige ståsted. Abstract in English ‘Should assisted dying be legal?’ is a question that has been and continues to be actively discussed throughout the Western world, leading several countries to change their laws in recent years. This anthology provides a thorough introduction to the question from a Nordic perspective. Contributing authors from Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland present the legal frameworks, practices and debates unique to each country. The book gives a broad overview of the issue and also conveys research and experiences from the Netherlands, the United States and Canada. The book has a clear tenor – in the form of a critical stance toward legalization. The primary emphasis is on arguments against legalization, although arguments in favor of legalization are also examined. An objective with this book is to advance the public exchange of opinion, and the authors put forth suggestions for common terminology and identify different tracks in the debate. Assisted Dying in the Nordic Countries? Ethics, Experience and Politics is an important book for those who wish to immerse themselves deeply in the question of assisted dying and the debate on legalization. The book is written for a broad audience, but will be particularly relevant for healthcare workers, students in medicine, other health-related fields and ethics, as well as politicians and journalists. The authors have varied backgrounds within medicine, philosophy, medical ethics, theology and linguistics, and they elucidate the question for a variety of professional and personal perspectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".