A case of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome complicating colon cancer and confirming endoscopic course
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 66-year-old man visited our hospital complaining of anorexia and hair loss. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed polyposis with redness throughout the gastric mucosa. Colon scopy also showed polyposis over the entire colon and was complicated by sigmoid colon cancer. On pathological examination, mucous lamina propria was accompanied by cystic dilation of the gland, mucosal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, and it was a diagnosis of hamartomatous polyps. Based on the above, the patient was diagnosed with Cronkhite-Canada syndrome complicated with colon cancer. Steroid treatmet was started after surgical treatment for colon cancer. After the start of steroid treatment, gastrointestinal tract lesons, alopecia and anorexia was improved. Since steroid treatment was gradually reduced and remission was made, steroid treatment was terminated. However gastrointestinal tract lesions and alopecia worsened, steroid treatment was resumed, and treatment is continued now. Discontinuation and low-dose maintenance of steroid in treatment of CCS have not been clarified in previous studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".