MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038780690 · doi:10.11641/pde.96.1_181

A case of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome complicating colon cancer and confirming endoscopic course

2020· article· en· W3038780690 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Makoto Tamamushi, Junichi Iwamoto, Naoki Konishi, Takeshi Hirayama, Hajime Ueda, Tadakuni Monma, Shoichiro Yara, Masashi Murakami, Tadashi Ikegami

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress of Digestive Endoscopy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLamina propriaColorectal cancerGastroenterologyGastrointestinal tractDiscontinuationSigmoid colonColonoscopyInternal medicineAnorexiaPathologicalCancerSurgeryPathologyRectumEpithelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 66-year-old man visited our hospital complaining of anorexia and hair loss. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed polyposis with redness throughout the gastric mucosa. Colon scopy also showed polyposis over the entire colon and was complicated by sigmoid colon cancer. On pathological examination, mucous lamina propria was accompanied by cystic dilation of the gland, mucosal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, and it was a diagnosis of hamartomatous polyps. Based on the above, the patient was diagnosed with Cronkhite-Canada syndrome complicated with colon cancer. Steroid treatmet was started after surgical treatment for colon cancer. After the start of steroid treatment, gastrointestinal tract lesons, alopecia and anorexia was improved. Since steroid treatment was gradually reduced and remission was made, steroid treatment was terminated. However gastrointestinal tract lesions and alopecia worsened, steroid treatment was resumed, and treatment is continued now. Discontinuation and low-dose maintenance of steroid in treatment of CCS have not been clarified in previous studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress of Digestive EndoscopySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207