MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3038849551 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2020.3007191

Robust Recursive RSSD Based Source Localization in Gaussian Mixture Channels

2020· article· en· W3038849551 on OpenAlexaff
Hannan Lohrasbipeydeh, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCramér–Rao boundEstimatorGaussian noiseAlgorithmGaussianMathematicsNoise (video)Upper and lower boundsNoise measurementBenchmark (surveying)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceApplied mathematicsEstimation theoryNoise reductionStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signal strength based localization methods are of great interest due to their low cost and simple implementation. In this letter, a received signal strength difference (RSSD) based approach is presented to localize a source with unknown transmit power. A robust two stage estimator is proposed. First, an RSSD based optimization problem is formulated in the presence of Gaussian mixture measurement noise based on Huber's minimax model. This yields a nonlinear problem which can be approximated by Taylor series expansion. Then, a robust recursive least squares (RRLS) method is developed to provide a robust solution of the approximated problem. The corresponding Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for correlated Gaussian mixture noise is also derived as a performance benchmark. Results are presented which show that the RRLS method attains the CRLB for a sufficiently large signal to noise ratio (SNR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207