MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Jan Tavernier. “The Functions of Abrupt Spellings in the Elamite Writing System”

2019· article· en· W3038899136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracta Iranica · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAkkadianSpellingCuneiformHistoryWriting systemLinguisticsLiteraturePeriod (music)Boundary (topology)MathematicsPhilosophyArtAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the abrupt spellings (the type (C)VC-VC and also, as it appears from the treatment of the author, (C)VC-V) in the Elamite cuneiform writing system from the Old up to the Achaemenid Elamite period and in various kinds of texts (administrative, royal and legal) in Elamite and also Akkadian language. Tavernier identifies four functions for this kind of spelling: 1. to mark the boundary between two components of a compound, especially in proper names, e.g. Akkadian (in the ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it