Effects of forced taxonomic transitions on metabolic composition and function in microbial microcosms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surveys of microbial systems indicate that in many situations taxonomy and function may constitute largely independent ('decoupled') axes of variation. However, this decoupling is rarely explicitly tested experimentally, partly because it is hard to directly induce taxonomic variation without affecting functional composition. Here we experimentally evaluate this paradigm using microcosms resembling lake sediments and subjected to two different levels of salinity (0 and 19) and otherwise similar environmental conditions. We used DNA sequencing for taxonomic and functional profiling of bacteria and archaea and physicochemical measurements to monitor metabolic function, over 13 months. We found that the taxonomic composition of the saline systems gradually but strongly diverged from the fresh systems. In contrast, the metabolic composition (in terms of proportions of various genes) remained nearly identical across treatments and over time. Oxygen consumption rates and methane concentrations were substantially lower in the saline treatment, however, their similarity either increased (for oxygen) or did not change significantly (for methane) between the first and last sampling time, indicating that the lower metabolic activity in the saline treatments was directly and immediately caused by salinity rather than the gradual taxonomic divergence. Our experiment demonstrates that strong taxonomic shifts need not directly affect metabolic rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".