La justice déontique et l’engagement des salariés envers l’organisation. Cas d’un hôpital tunisien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article développe une meilleure compréhension du comportement organisationnel des employés en montrant que la perception de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise (RSE) peut influencer les attitudes et les comportements des individus au travail, en particulier l’engagement envers l’organisation. Cette étude suggère que la justice déontique explique le lien entre la perception de la RSE et l’engagement organisationnel dans ses trois formes (calculé, affectif et normatif). Sur la base d’une approche qualitative, des entretiens ont été menés auprès des employés tunisiens du secteur hospitalier (n=25). Les résultats sont discutés en détails ainsi que les implications managériales (formation des gestionnaires et mise en place des chartes éthiques) et théoriques de la recherche .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".