MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039087774 · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c05410

Boramidine: A Versatile Structural Motif for the Design of Fluorescent Heterocycles

2020· article· en· W3039087774 on OpenAlexafffund
Yury Lebedev, Chirag Apte, Susan Cheng, Cyrille Lavigne, Alan J. Lough, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik, Dwight S. Seferos, Andrei K. Yudin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistry
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChemistryFluorescenceStructural motifSolubilityBoronCombinatorial chemistrySolid-stateStokes shiftPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sodium cyanoborohydride-derived N -alkylnitriliumboranes were found to be versatile precursors for the synthesis of novel boron-containing heterocycles. The reaction between N -alkylnitriliumboranes and 2-aminopyridines, imidazoles, oxazoles, or isoxazoles leads to the incorporation of the [B–C] motif into a five-membered boramidine, which exists as a mixture of Z and E isomers. The resulting heterocycles are blue fluorescent in both the solid state and in solution with ca. 2700–8400 cm –1 Stokes shifts and quantum yields in the 65–74% range in water and in the 42–84% range in organic solvents. The combination of photophysical properties, structural tunability, stability, and solubility in various media is expected to find application in a range of disciplines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistryFrench-language works237,207