ASSESSMENT OF POST-BURN WOUNDS IN CHILDREN AFTER USING BIOPLASTIC COLLAGEN MATERIAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. Assessment of the state of healed burn wounds after their treatment is an urgent problem at the present time.Aim of the research. To assess the condition of post-burn wounds in 1 and 6 months after the completion of treatment of II-III degree burns (according to ICD-10) in children using bioplastic collagenous material "Collost" in various forms and traditional local conservative therapy using hydrocolloid dressings.Material and methods. The condition of the healed wound was assessed at discharge, as well as after 1 and 6 months in 48 patients using modified Vancouver Scar Scale (management of burn wounds: main group - bioplastic material and hydrocolloid dressings; control group - hydrocolloid dressings).Results. The use of native collagen in the complex treatment of thermal trauma helps to reduce the relative and absolute risk after 1 and 6 months as well as to lower adverse trends from the post-burn wound.Conclusions. The obtained results suggest further investigation of the mechanism of influence of type I collagenbased drugs on the dynamics of the wound process in thermal burns, as well as the study of its effect on individual wound characteristics described by the Vancouver scar scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".