Large Intelligent Surface Assisted Wireless Communications With Spatial Modulation and Antenna Selection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Novel communication technology based on large intelligent surface (LIS) [1] has arisen recently, with the aim to enhance the signal quality at the receiver. In this paper, a practical structure of LIS-based spatial modulation (LIS-SM) is proposed, in order to utilize both transmit and receive antenna indices. Meanwhile, the theoretical average bit error rate (ABER) performance bound of the developed LIS-SM scheme is investigated. For the sake of achieving further spatial diversity gain, we extend its employment to the antenna selection (AS) scenario, and a low-complexity selection algorithm is designed on the basis of minimum squared Euclidian distance and signal-to-leakage-and-noise ratio as well as the idea of greedy elimination algorithm. Performance analysis shows that AS-aided LIS-SM is more robust in terms of ABER compared with conventional LIS-SM. Moreover, complexity analysis also depicts that the proposed fast selection algorithm achieves much lower complexity yet a comparable ABER performance, compared to the traditional exhaustive search.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it