MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039257639 · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67114-2

Identification of key genes in ruptured atherosclerotic plaques by weighted gene correlation network analysis

2020· article· en· W3039257639 on OpenAlexafffund
Baofeng Xu, Rui Liu, Chunxia Huang, Binsheng He, Guangyi Li, Hong‐Shuo Sun, Zhong‐Ping Feng, Meihua Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsKEGGGeneComputational biologyIdentification (biology)BiologyFocal adhesionBioinformaticsGeneticsGene expressionCellGene ontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The rupture of atherosclerotic plaques is essential for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Identification of the key genes related to plaque rupture is an important approach to predict the status of plaque and to prevent the clinical events. In the present study, we downloaded two expression profiles related to the rupture of atherosclerotic plaques (GSE41571 and GSE120521) from GEO database. 11 samples in GSE41571 were used to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and to construct the weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) by R software. The gene oncology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment tool in DAVID website, and the Protein-protein interactions in STRING website were used to predict the functions and mechanisms of genes. Furthermore, we mapped the hub genes extracted from WGCNA to DEGs, and constructed a sub-network using Cytoscape 3.7.2. The key genes were identified by the molecular complex detection (MCODE) in Cytoscape. Further validation was conducted using dataset GSE120521 and human carotid endarterectomy (CEA) plaques. Results: In our study, 868 DEGs were identified in GSE41571. Six modules with 236 hub genes were identified through WGCNA analysis. Among these six modules, blue and brown modules were of the highest correlations with ruptured plaques (with a correlation of 0.82 and −0.9 respectively). 72 hub genes were identified from blue and brown modules. These 72 genes were the most likely ones being related to cell adhesion, extracellular matrix organization, cell growth, cell migration, leukocyte migration, PI 3 K-Akt signaling, focal adhesion, and ECM-receptor interaction. Among the 72 hub genes, 45 were mapped to the DEGs (logFC > 1.0, p-value < 0.05). The sub-network of these 45 hub genes and MCODE analysis indicated 3 clusters (13 genes) as key genes. They were LOXL1, FBLN5, FMOD, ELN, EFEMP1 in cluster 1, RILP, HLA-DRA, HLA-DMB, HLA-DMA in cluster 2, and SFRP4, FZD6, DKK3 in cluster 3. Further expression detection indicated EFEMP1, BGN, ELN, FMOD, DKK3, FBLN5, FZD6, HLA-DRA, HLA-DMB, HLA-DMA, and RILP might have potential diagnostic value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207