MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039271367 · doi:10.1080/26410397.2020.1779633

Why self-managed abortion is so much more than a provisional solution for times of pandemic

2020· article· en· W3039271367 on OpenAlexaff
Mariana Prandini Assis, Sara Larrea

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual and Reproductive Health Matters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)AbortionFace (sociological concept)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakHealth carePolitical scienceEconomic growthSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)BusinessMedicineSociologyEconomicsVirologyPregnancySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic is striking health care systems around the world through an unprecedented increase in demand. In responding to this crisis, governments and health care providers face the chal...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.012
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0110.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexual and Reproductive Health MattersSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207