MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039278392 · doi:10.4000/ateliers.13527

Ik’aletik « Les hommes noirs »

2020· article· fr· W3039278392 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rocío Noemí Martínez González

Bibliographic record

VenueAteliers d anthropologie · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article veut montrer comment les multiples noms attribués aux acteurs de la fête k’in tajimol : Seigneurs Noirs, Seigneurs du vent, Nos pères singes, Pères métis de la nuit, Diable, Judas, Frère aîné métis, révèlent leur nature nocturne. Ces personnages, qui se dressent depuis le monde des morts comme ancêtres des Tsotsil, s’opposent à Notre père Soleil et à son épouse, et aux Serviteurs du Christ. Les actions des ik’aletik dans le municipe constitutionnel de Chenalhó présentent d’importantes variations avec celles du municipe autonome zapatiste de Polhó. Les noms utilisés pour les identifier dans chaque lieu et les actions qu’ils effectuent déterminent leurs multiples ontologies liées à la nuit, au sacrifice et aux ancêtres patrilinéaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAteliers d anthropologieSame topicCulinary Culture and TourismFrench-language works237,207