MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039278392 · doi:10.4000/ateliers.13527

Ik’aletik « Les hommes noirs »

2020· article· fr· W3039278392 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rocío Noemí Martínez González

Bibliographic record

VenueAteliers d anthropologie · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article veut montrer comment les multiples noms attribués aux acteurs de la fête k’in tajimol : Seigneurs Noirs, Seigneurs du vent, Nos pères singes, Pères métis de la nuit, Diable, Judas, Frère aîné métis, révèlent leur nature nocturne. Ces personnages, qui se dressent depuis le monde des morts comme ancêtres des Tsotsil, s’opposent à Notre père Soleil et à son épouse, et aux Serviteurs du Christ. Les actions des ik’aletik dans le municipe constitutionnel de Chenalhó présentent d’importantes variations avec celles du municipe autonome zapatiste de Polhó. Les noms utilisés pour les identifier dans chaque lieu et les actions qu’ils effectuent déterminent leurs multiples ontologies liées à la nuit, au sacrifice et aux ancêtres patrilinéaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAteliers d anthropologieSame topicCulinary Culture and TourismFrench-language works237,207