MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association and Scheduling in Energy Harvesting Networks: Age of Information and Fairness Trade-off

2020· article· en· W3039417973 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnapsack problemNetwork packetComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Fairness measureMathematical optimizationDynamic programmingJob shop schedulingDynamic priority schedulingEfficient energy useDistributed computingComputer networkWirelessAlgorithmThroughputMathematicsQuality of serviceRouting (electronic design automation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the problem of minimizing the age of information (AoI) by optimally associating users to energy harvesting access points (EH-APs) and scheduling their packets that have stringent deadlines constraints. With a single EH-AP, this problem is already shown to be NP-hard. First, we consider the single EH-AP scenario and study the fairness between packets. We show the existence of fairness-AoI tradeoff. Further, we improve the previously proposed algorithms by reducing the average age of information. Finally, the general problem is considered. We reduce the problem to a knapsack problem and propose a dynamic programming approach to solve it. We present simulation results and show the efficiency of the proposed solutions compared to the optimal and the state-of-the-art ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207