MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3039430553 · doi:10.3138/utq.89.1.09

Lost Islands, Future Islands: Reading Wayde Compton’s <i>The Outer Harbour</i> Relationally

2020· article· en· W3039430553 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Joanne Leow

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPraxisHarbourHistoryReading (process)KinshipGenealogyAnthropologySociologyLinguisticsPhilosophyEcologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay explores the different sets of resonances that might be possible by interweaving readings of texts by Wayde Compton, Tekahionwake (Pauline Johnson), and Lee Maracle. Read alongside Tekahionwake’s “The Lost Island” and Maracle’s “Goodbye Snauq,” the stories in Compton’s The Outer Harbour illuminate possible directions for reconfiguring Indigenous and diasporic relations on the unceded Coast Salish territories that we call Vancouver. This critical praxis constitutes an alternate confluence, a decolonizing engagement where my analysis contextualizes Compton’s stories in terms of Indigenous and diasporic literary solidarities. As Compton’s stories suggest, Indigenous, diasporic, and non-human lives are already inextricably entangled. In The Outer Harbour, Compton moves beyond the question of whether diasporic subjects should be here to question their responsibilities now that they inhabit this space. In other words, this essay asks how kinship functions in the already fractured, corrupted, colonized contact zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.023
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicShort Stories in Global Literature→French-language works237,207→