Assessment of the vasoactive effects of the (S)-epimers of ergot alkaloids in vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ergot alkaloids are produced by the fungus Claviceps purpurea and their levels are carefully monitored in animal and human diets due to their harmful effects and widespread contamination of cereal crops. Ergot alkaloids exist in two forms known as the (R)- and (S)-epimers with only the former being monitored in diets in North America. The (S)-epimers of ergot alkaloids are thought to be biologically inactive and, therefore, harmless. A major mechanism by which the (R)-epimers of ergot alkaloids produce their toxic effect is through vasoconstriction. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the vasoactivity potential (contractile response) of four (S)-epimers, namely ergocryptinine, ergocristinine, ergocorninine, and ergotaminine utilizing an in vitro arterial tissue bath system. Bovine metatarsal arteries (n = 6, ergocryptinine and ergocorninine; n = 6, ergocristinine and ergotaminine; n = 6 arteries/(S)-epimer, total n = 12) were collected from healthy mixed-breed beef steers immediately after slaughter, cut into 3-mm arterial cross sections, and suspended in a tissue bath with continuously oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit buffer. To assess the contractile response of each (S)-epimer, a cumulative contractile dose-response curve was constructed by incubating arteries with increasing concentrations (1 × 10-11 to 1 × 10-6 M) of that (S)-epimer. Contractile responses were recorded as grams of tension and were normalized to an initial contraction of phenylephrine. Contrary to the widespread belief, all tested (S)-epimers were found vasoactive and produced a concentration-dependent arterial contractile response similar to what has been reported for the (R)-epimers. The arterial contractile response to ergotaminine was strongest and was significantly greater than that of ergocryptinine and ergocristinine at the highest concentration used (P ≤ 0.01). Our results indicate that the (S)-epimers are biologically active and are likely harmful similar to the (R)-epimers. The levels of (S)-epimers should be carefully monitored in human and animal diets worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".