MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3039486747 · doi:10.1101/2020.06.30.180943

Mechanism and effects of the skeletal muscle Nav1.4 inhibition by cannabidiol

2020· preprint· en· W3039486747 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad‐Reza Ghovanloo, Koushik Choudhury, Tagore Sanketh Bandaru, Mohamed A. Fouda, Kaveh Rayani, Radda Rusinova, Tejas Phaterpekar, Karen Nelkenbrecher, Abeline R. Watkins, Damon Poburko, Jenifer Thewalt, Olaf S. Andersen, Lucie Delemotte, Samuel J. Goodchild, Peter C. Ruben

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsXenon Pharmaceuticals (Canada)Simon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCannabidiolSodium channelChemistryBiophysicsNAV1PharmacologyBiochemistryBiologyMedicineCannabisSodium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Cannabis sativa contains active constituents called phytocannabinoids. Some phytocannabinoids are psychotropic and others are not. The primary non-psychotropic phytocannabinoid is cannabidiol (CBD), which is proposed to be therapeutic against many conditions, including muscle spasms. Mechanisms have been proposed for the action of CBD on different systems, involving multiple targets, including the voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav) family, which are heavily implicated in many of the conditions CBD has been reported to relieve. In this study, we investigated the modulatory mechanism of CBD on Nav1.4. Based on previous results, we tested the hypothesis that CBD mechanism of action involves: 1) modulation of membrane elasticity, which indirectly contributes to Nav inhibition; and 2) physical block of the Nav pore. We first performed molecular dynamic (MD) simulations to visualize CBD effects and localization inside the membrane, and then performed NMR to verify the MD results, showing CBD localizes below membrane headgroups. Then, we performed a gramicidin-based fluorescence (GFA) assay that showed CBD alters membrane elasticity. Next, we used site-directed mutagenesis in (F1586A) and around (WWWW) the Nav1.4 pore. Removing the local anesthetic binding site with F1586A reduced CBD block of INa. Occluding the fenestrations with WWWW blocked CBD access from the membrane into the Nav1.4 pore. However, stabilization of inactivation, via CBD-induced changes in membrane elasticity persisted, in WWWW. To investigate the potential therapeutic value of CBD against some Nav1.4 channelopathies, we used a pathogenic variant of Nav1.4, P1158S, known to cause myotonia and periodic paralysis. We found CBD reduces excitability in both wild-type and the mixed myotonia/periodic paralysis variant. Our in-vitro/in-silico results suggest that CBD may have therapeutic value against myotonia. Because Nav1.4 is crucial to skeletal muscle contraction, we used rat diaphragm myography and found the presence of saturating levels of CBD reduces skeletal muscle contraction. SUMMARY We used multidisciplinary approaches to show the mechanism and pathway by which CBD inhibits the skeletal muscle, Nav1.4. Our results suggest CBD modulates membrane elasticity and directly interacts with Nav1.4 within its pore.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→French-language works237,207→