Automated stroke lesion segmentation in non-contrast CT scans using dense multi-path contextual generative adversarial network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stroke lesion volume is a key radiologic measurement in assessing prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. The aim of this paper is to develop an automated segmentation method for accurately segmenting follow-up ischemic and hemorrhagic lesion from multislice non-contrast CT (NCCT) volumes of AIS patients. This paper proposes a 2D dense multi-path contextual generative adversarial network (MPC-GAN) where a dense multi-path 2D U-Net is utilized as the generator and a discriminator network is applied to regularize the generator. Contextual information (i.e. bilateral intensity difference, distance map and lesion location probability) are input into the generator and discriminator. The proposed method is validated separately on follow-up NCCT volumes of 60 patients with ischemic infarcts and NCCT volumes of 70 patients with hemorrhages. Quantitative results demonstrated that the proposed MPC-GAN method obtained a Dice coefficient (DC) of 70.6% for ischemic infarct segmentation and a DC of 76.5% for hemorrhage segmentation compared with manual segmented lesions, outperforming several benchmark methods. Additional volumetric analyses demonstrated that the MPC-GAN segmented lesion volume correlated well with manual measurements (Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.926 and 0.927 for ischemic infarcts and hemorrhages, respectively). The proposed MPC-GAN method can accurately segment ischemic infarcts and hemorrhages from NCCT volumes of AIS patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".