MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039531374

Le patrimoine documentaire au Québec

2020· article· fr· W3039531374 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claire Seguin

Bibliographic record

VenueCairn.info · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceMediationArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alliant memoire et modernite, l’etonnant ecosysteme documentaire Bibliotheque et Archives nationales du Quebec (BAnQ) s’appuie sur les approches de mediation culturelle et educative innovantes pour elargir ses publics. Dans le sillage des courants actuels, les bibliothecaires et les archivistes ne sont plus seulement des prescripteurs, ils mettent en scene de diverses facons le patrimoine documentaire. Au fil des ans, ils ont deploye des actions de communication et de partage, tant pour nourrir la curiosite du grand public et des familles qu’en soutien au milieu educatif. Leur posture professionnelle evolue : tout en conservant leurs valeurs fondamentales, ils deviennent createurs de contenus, passant eux aussi de l’ombre a la lumiere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCairn.infoSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207