Measurement of Cardiac Parameters by Motion Artifacts Free Photoplethysmography Signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the past, it has been extensively shown that photoplethysmography (PPG) signal has sufficient information to being utilized for monitoring of various cardiorespiratory parameters. However, motion artifacts, which caused by the voluntary or involuntary movements of the subject, degrade the accuracy and reliability of such a monitoring-based technique. In this work, we propose a novel signal processing methodology to efficiently and effectively remove the motion artifacts from the acquired PPG signals. The propounded technique includes the stop-band filters to filter out the motion artifacts frequencies. The central rejection frequencies of the filters are determined by analysis of accelerometer output signals in the frequency domain. Results illustrate that our proposed motion artifacts removal technique can enhance the accuracy estimation of different cardiorespiratory parameters, such as heart-rate, respiratory cycle, and blood oxygen saturation, in comparison to the PPG signals with the motion artifacts. We demonstrate the superiorities of our proposed method in terms of ease of implementation as well as efficiency by direct comparison to the conventional adaptive filtering methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".