MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039603287 · doi:10.24898/tandro.2020.76094

2866 Semen analiz raporunda, yaş faktörünün semen değerleri üzerine olası etkisinin araştırılması

2020· article· tr· W3039603287 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAndroloji Bülteni · 2020
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemenGynecologyAndrologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the present study is to determine the effect of the increasing age of men on volume, concentration and progressive motility of semen parameters and the role of them on male infertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2866 semen analysis of 2088 male patients who admitted to an andrology laboratory of a training and research hospital between 2007-2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The relation between increasing age of men and volume, concentration, total sperm count and progressive motility were evaluated. The first group (21-30 years old), second group (41-50 years old) and third group consisted of 1590, 1118 and 158 semen analysis, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it