MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039685176 · doi:10.1002/maco.202011770

Modeling microbial sulfate reduction and the consequences for corrosion of copper canisters

2020· article· en· W3039685176 on OpenAlexaff
Fraser King, Miroslav Kolàř, I. Puigdomènech, Petteri Pitkänen, Christina Lilja

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials and Corrosion · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsVancouver Island University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMackinawiteCorrosionSulfateDissolutionSulfideSideriteCopperOrganic matterGypsumChemistrySulfate-reducing bacteriaEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgyPyriteMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The copper sulfide model (CSM) is a one‐dimensional reactive transport code for predicting the evolution of the corrosion behavior of a copper canister in a deep geological repository. Here, the CSM has been extended to simulate the microbial reduction of sulfate in the repository and the consequences for corrosion of the canister. Organotrophic and chemotrophic sulfate reduction are represented by Monod kinetics, along with the dissolution of solid organic matter and gypsum as sources of nutrient and an electron acceptor, respectively. Siderite dissolution in the buffer and tunnel backfill materials acts as a source of Fe(II), which can then precipitate the microbially produced sulfide as mackinawite. Results are presented for a simulation representing the expected evolution of the corrosion behavior and repository environment and for a series of sensitivity analyses designed to identify the most important processes in the overall reaction scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials and CorrosionSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207