Supersymmetric generalized power functions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complex-valued functions defined on a finite interval [a, b] generalizing power functions of the type (x−x0)n for n ≥ 0 are studied. These functions called Φ-generalized powers, Φ being a given nonzero complex-valued function on the interval, were considered to construct a general solution representation of the Sturm–Liouville equation in terms of the spectral parameter [V. V. Kravchenko and R. M. Porter, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 33(4), 459–468 (2010)]. The Φ-generalized powers can be considered as natural basis functions for the one-dimensional supersymmetric quantum mechanics systems taking Φ=ψ02, where the function ψ0(x) is the ground state wave function of one of the supersymmetric scalar Hamiltonians. Several properties are obtained such as Φ-symmetric conjugate and antisymmetry of the Φ-generalized powers, a supersymmetric binomial identity for these functions, a supersymmetric Pythagorean elliptic (hyperbolic) identity involving four Φ-trigonometric (Φ-hyperbolic) functions, as well as a supersymmetric Taylor series expressed in terms of the Φ-derivatives. We show that the first n Φ-generalized powers are a fundamental set of solutions associated with nonconstant coefficient homogeneous linear ordinary differential equations of order n + 1. Finally, we present a general solution representation of the stationary Schrödinger equation in terms of geometric series where the Volterra compositions of the first type are considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it