MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3039698533 · doi:10.38146/bsz.2020.1.1

Genetika és bűnüldözés – Az igazságügyi célú DNS-vizsgálatok első negyedszázada Magyarországon II.

2020· article· en· W3039698533 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zsolt Pádár, Gábor Kovács, Mónika Nogel, András Czebe, Petra Zenke, Zsolt Kozma

Bibliographic record

VenueBelügyi Szemle · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForensic scienceForensic geneticsLaw enforcementQuarter (Canadian coin)CriminologyLawDNA profilingGenealogyPolitical scienceGeneticsHistoryDNABiologySociologyArchaeologyGeneMicrosatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA profiling has become one of the most significant tools of criminal investigation. By professional good practice critical and decisive information can be provided about a perpetrator. Usage of DNA test results for forensic purposes in Hungary started in the 1990’s. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of this eventful period. The study is divided into two parts. This part illustrates the current technical status and possible ways of future development, further the changes in legal regulation of forensic DNA tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelügyi SzemleSame topicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207